On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:24:31PM -0700, Cliff Wells wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 14:51, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:26:09PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 11:24, M. Fioretti wrote: > > > > > > > Everybody using collapsed view to save time will only see the original > > > > "Opera for RH 9, Aaron Konstam" message, missing the other questions > > > > (ie will have no possibility to give you advice, or will come tomorrow > > > > to ask the same questions) > > > > > > This is one of the reasons I dislike threaded mail in the first place. > > > > > > -- > > I feel like I unknowingly started a fired-storm. There was no real > > responses to miss. The opera rpm that says it works up to RH 8 has a > > problem with java in RH 9. I just wanted to know if there was a more > > RH 9 friendly opera out there. The funniest thing about the opera is > > that it asks your to run : opera -debug-java > > when you do is says to comment lines in a file and does not show you > > what line they are talking about. > > I know you're just trying to get an answer and possibly feel a bit > responsible for the little argument (btw, you aren't), but did you not > notice the topic of this particular thread? Or was this an example of > understated irony? > > Regards, I realized that the possibility existed that not changing the header added to the problem. In retrospect I should have been more careful. There are better things to be ironic about.- ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University 715 Stadium Dr. San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 telephone: (210)-999-7484 email:akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
