Re: No Bluefish in Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 13:39, Mike Burger wrote:
[snip]
> Unless you specifically told the installation to not install Qt, it was 
> installed, and most of, if not all of, the KDE capable apps should work.
> -- 
> Mike Burger
> http://www.bubbanfriends.org
[snip]

Mike,

I know that and I always go through great pains to make sure the
installer only installs what I want, which is Gtk2/Gnome2 only and not a
single piece of Qt/KDE. Don't use it so why take up disk space, clutter
my system, etc. I can install Bluefish myself. That's not the problem. I
just think RH9 is missing a Gtk2/Gnome2 html editor and that RH imho
should add Bluefish to the new beta. Why should anyone on a Gtk2/Gnome2
based box have to install Qt (and perhaps some KDE parts) just because
the only available html editor is Qt (KDE?) based. That's just silly,
especially given the fact that Bluefish is quite stable and readily
available.

Regards,
Patrick


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux