Re: RedHat Linux 9.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21 Jun 2003 16:36:07 -0400, Nicholas Parsons wrote:

> Hi Mike,
> 
> I've read that paragraph before and was never fully satisfied with 
> it.  Besides some bug fixes there isn't much difference between 
> Red Hat 8.0 and Red Hat 9.  Sure you can say the kernel is "newer" 
> but anyone can download the latest kernel patch and compile it 
> on their own machine.  Those kernels are mostly the same anyway,
> at least for "normal" users who don't hack kernel code.  I was 
> hoping that someone would provide me with some more facts 
> about the differences between these two versions. 

Okay, if you don't see any incompatibilities introduced with the
Native POSIX Thread Library (NTPL), then get some clarification
here, a posting by Matt Wilson from Red Hat:

https://listman.redhat.com/archives/phoebe-list/2003-March/msg01067.html

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+9Mhp0iMVcrivHFQRAn1yAJ9D33xxh3pgTwzAlrT1DQ+DyjuQpgCeKAWH
VnnY2vlIw2qi17qr58XV8ng=
=3zQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux