Plus it is really critical stuff like the IDE layer (disk corruption risks) and several very popular drivers. A good 4-6 months until server-class quality, unless the bug-fixing goes in overdrive. Torvalds is talking about a 2.6-pre release pretty soon, maybe as soon as the next release. On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 00:30, Klaasjan Brand wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-01 at 03:40, Audioslave - 7M3 - Live wrote: > > shrek-m@xxxxxx wrote: > > > have i overlooked something about a new beta? > > > > > > the link to phoebe-3 seems to be the latest :-( > > > > > > > I checked for a new beta today. It was on Duke's server. Phoebe 3 was > > the last listed. I too am waiting for the next beta cycle. Hopefully > > with the 2.5 or 2.6 kernel. > > Don't count on it. Seems like the 2.6 TODO list is still long enough to > use as wallpaper for a medium sized house I guess we should be really > happy if 2.6 can be declared this year... but RedHat has backported most > of the interesting stuff to 2.4 it seems... > > It might be a good idea to make 2.5/2.6-test rpm's available to increase > bug feedback though. Thinking about making them myself, as soon as the > more extreme disk corruption problems are ironed out... > > Klaasjan -- Z <zleite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
