Re: iptables and lokkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 13:01:14 -0400, John Meagher wrote:

> [root@xxxxxxxxx sysconfig]# iptables -L

You'll find that the output of "iptables-save" is much more
readable and complete. If I had to use "iptables -L", I would
add option "-v" (--verbose). But iptables-save is great.

> 1) Why does Lokkit put that first rule in there? And since it's there,
> why doesn't it work?
> Shouldn't it cause the rest of the rules to be ignored?

"iptables -L" usually does not include enough details.

> 2) Why does a second, identical rule get honored, (i.e. the firewall is
> opened up)
> if I add it with "iptables -I RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT 1 -j ACCEPT"

This may be a completely different rule.

> 3) Lokkit uses options -p udp -m udp in the rules it puts in
> /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
> What's the -m option?  There was a -m for mark in ipchains, but that
> doesn't seem relevant.

- -m is short for --match, see "man iptables", MATCH EXTENSIONS.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/BcY50iMVcrivHFQRAnd+AJ47RIc6AD161yxWRMScPXx154UkdwCfTpKx
jM8tpf94bXxTE4wGeKvbDDU=
=WcTh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux