On Friday 25 April 2003 12:03, Res wrote: > > Postmasters) find an acceptable way of reducing spam without killing so > > many broadband users. > > We do, you have hit last resport status. There is a direct correlation between a percentage of successfully blocked spam and a percentage of legitimate mail that didn't get through. Now let's be honest about it - how much time does it take you to implement those lovely anti-UCE measures? And every time you implement a new one, don't you notice that a more clever spammer still finds a way around it? So there goes a new round of configuration changes - until next time... It's an endless battle. No offense but, a postmaster who decides to block a whole range of IP addresses because one or two spammers in that range spam your mail server is a lousy sysadmin (if I were your boss, you'd be gone by now). Unless of course your mail server exists for other purposes than business. Ladislav
