Did this work? I used the somewhat hidden "Reply to List" button. Brian > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:45:09 +0200 > From: Michael Schwendt <ms0301rh@xxxxxxxx> > To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: PRESERVE THREADS! > Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 22 Apr 2003 07:28:45 -0400, Brian Hanks wrote: > > > > Message: 10 > > > Subject: re: PRESERVE THREADS! > > [lots of unnecessary quotes deleted] > > > I completely agree that threads should be preserved, but I do have an issue. > > For some reason my replies from Evolution never stay within the original thread. > > No idea why, it just started happening a while back. Regardless of how I reply > > it ends up as the beginning of a new thread. > > > > Suggestions for those of us who are trying to comply but failing? > > Apparently you are subscribed to the digest version. Your reply was a reply to > a message digest. Hence the following headers in your reply: > > In-Reply-To: <20030422005939.170DA3F36F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References: <20030422005939.170DA3F36F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Unless the MIME version of the digests (you can switch between two > digest formats) supplies the necessary message headers for every > message, you could not preserve threading. > > - -- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+pVV10iMVcrivHFQRAvUxAJ0dBw+ktth5/XHOBJrwo6+FreIPVACdGh4r > D0F8hjTw/2jCgT3czeBrI8s= > =zJt/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > From: Jesse Keating <hosting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Organization: j2Solutions > To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: PRESERVE THREADS! > Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:49:50 -0700 > Reply-To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > On Tuesday 22 April 2003 04:28, Brian Hanks uttered: > > I completely agree that threads should be preserved, but I do have an > > issue. For some reason my replies from Evolution never stay within the > > original thread. No idea why, it just started happening a while back. > > Regardless of how I reply it ends up as the beginning of a new thread. > > > > Suggestions for those of us who are trying to comply but failing? > > The problem is that there is no (that I know of) RFC or standard out there for > headers to mark it as part of a thread. It seems that every major email > reader has it's own way of handling it, and a lot of times, will fail on > another reader. > > For evolution, have you set aside a specific folder for shrike messages, and > have you set the folder attributes to say that it contains a mailing list? > Is this even possible w/ Evolution? When you hit reply, does it send the > reply to the original sender, and CC the list? THat could mess it up. Try > to get your client to reply directly to the list address, not CC'ing anybody. > > -- > Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE > http://geek.j2solutions.net > Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) > > Was I helpful? Let others know: > http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating > >
