Works for me with 2.4.21-pre7 and the pre-6 ACPI patch on top. No XFS patch though (will be next...) On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 01:37, Jurgen Kramer wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to get PCMCIA to work > with a custom kernel. What I want is a kernel > with proper ACPI support and working PCMCIA. With > the stock 2.4.20 and 2.4.20-xfs I get (after modifying the PCMCIA > init scripts): > > Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22 > options: [pci] [cardbus] [pm] > Yenta IRQ list 0408, PCI irq11 > Socket status: 30000410 > Yenta IRQ list 0408, PCI irq11 > Socket status: 30000006 > cs: memory probe 0x0c0000-0x0fffff: excluding 0xc0000-0xcbfff > 0xe0000-0xfffff > hermes.c: 5 Apr 2002 David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > orinoco.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others) > orinoco_cs.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and > others) > orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use > > With the stock RH kernel it looks like: > > Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22 > options: [pci] [cardbus] [pm] > PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:09.0 > PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.1 > PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.2 > PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:09.1 > PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.0 > PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.2 > Yenta IRQ list 0608, PCI irq11 > Socket status: 30000410 > Yenta IRQ list 0208, PCI irq11 > Socket status: 30000006 > cs: IO port probe 0x0c00-0x0cff: clean. > cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x480-0x48f 0x4d0-0x4d7 > cs: IO port probe 0x0a00-0x0aff: clean. > cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean. > hermes.c: 5 Apr 2002 David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > orinoco.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others) > orinoco_cs.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and > others) > divert: allocating divert_blk for eth1 > eth1: Station identity xxxx:xxx:xxxx:xxxx > eth1: Looks like a Lucent/Agere firmware version 7.28 > eth1: Ad-hoc demo mode supported > eth1: IEEE standard IBSS ad-hoc mode supported > eth1: WEP supported, 104-bit key > eth1: MAC address 00:02:2D:52:F5:E3 > eth1: Station name "HERMES I" > > There's a real difference with the IRQ map.. > > So now I am stuck between a standard RH kernel without proper ACPI > support (and therefore with bogus battery low messages) or with a kernel > without working PCMCIA support..:-( > > Any solutions? > > Cheers, > > Jurgen > > > > > > -- > Shrike-list mailing list > Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
