More PCMCIA trouble...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I have been trying to get PCMCIA to work
with a custom kernel. What I want is a kernel
with proper ACPI support and working PCMCIA. With
the stock 2.4.20 and 2.4.20-xfs I get (after modifying the PCMCIA
init scripts):

Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22
  options:  [pci] [cardbus] [pm]
Yenta IRQ list 0408, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000410
Yenta IRQ list 0408, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000006
cs: memory probe 0x0c0000-0x0fffff: excluding 0xc0000-0xcbfff
0xe0000-0xfffff
hermes.c: 5 Apr 2002 David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
orinoco.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others)
orinoco_cs.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and
others)
orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use

With the stock RH kernel it looks like:

Linux Kernel Card Services 3.1.22
  options:  [pci] [cardbus] [pm]
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:09.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.2
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:09.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 00:09.2
Yenta IRQ list 0608, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000410
Yenta IRQ list 0208, PCI irq11
Socket status: 30000006
cs: IO port probe 0x0c00-0x0cff: clean.
cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 0x480-0x48f 0x4d0-0x4d7
cs: IO port probe 0x0a00-0x0aff: clean.
cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean.
hermes.c: 5 Apr 2002 David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
orinoco.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and others)
orinoco_cs.c 0.11b (David Gibson <hermes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and
others)
divert: allocating divert_blk for eth1
eth1: Station identity xxxx:xxx:xxxx:xxxx
eth1: Looks like a Lucent/Agere firmware version 7.28
eth1: Ad-hoc demo mode supported
eth1: IEEE standard IBSS ad-hoc mode supported
eth1: WEP supported, 104-bit key
eth1: MAC address 00:02:2D:52:F5:E3
eth1: Station name "HERMES I"

There's a real difference with the IRQ map..

So now I am stuck between a standard RH kernel without proper ACPI
support (and therefore with bogus battery low messages) or with a kernel
without working PCMCIA support..:-(

Any solutions?

Cheers,

Jurgen







[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux