On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 23:10, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, M. Fioretti <m.fioretti@xxxxxxxxx> said: > > I heard a member of my local LUG say "I don't like RH9, it has too many > > obsolete packages". When I asked him to be specific he listed > > (translated and sinthesized from italian, I can provide the original > > LUG archive URL if anybody wants it): > > > > Quite old versions of Mozilla/Galeon > > "Quite old"? RHL9 includes Mozilla 1.2.1. The next released version, > 1.3, was released on March 13. RHL9 was released (to RHN) on March 31, > less than three weeks later. A new version would have required more > time for testing and QA. Red Hat can't control other projects' release > schedules (nor is it practical to wait on a new version of something, as > there is always some project "just about" to release a new version). How about openldap 2.1.17? ;-) RH9 includes openldap-2.0.27... In general, I think RHL9 is pretty up2date. -- Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Linux Registered User #287198
