** Reply to message from Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@xxxxxxxxxx> on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:30:06 +0200 > On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 10:20, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > Would you call this very popular bug "serious enough"? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76446 > > without going into details about this bug (bugzilla seems down right > now), one of the factors is the risk of a bugfix; eg glibc and rpm are > obviously high risk for breaking something else while fixing the bug, > which makes it more tricky to do errata for those, and makes the > threshold higher for doing an erratum. Exactly. Which is why fixing an app such as the redhat-config-network which is the bug Michael referred to should be lower risk, no? jb
