Re: Bugfix errata?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



** Reply to message from Shawn <drevil@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wed, 09 Apr 2003 14:56:10 -0500

> On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 14:44, David Krider wrote:
> > Florin Andrei wrote:
> > > It seems like the "free" Red Hat releases will always be on the
> > > "bleeding edge" side of things.
> > > The real stable Red Hat distribution is their commercial version, the
> > > one you pay money for (Red Hat Enterprise Linux).
> > 
> > Blah, blah, blah. We're all well aware of the cotton'-pickin' 
> > arrangement. I paraphrased much of this myself. That's not the point. 
> > The question remains: Is Red Hat going to address the bugs in this 
> > release with bugfix erratas, or simply roll the fixes forward into the 
> > next release of RHL (with its attendant bugs).
> 
> I'm fairly certain that they will be addressing the serious issues in
> errata releases, I believe glibc will be one of these.

The apache and glibc errata popped up this afternoon.

jb





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux