Re: Bugfix errata?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bugfix errata?
From: Tom Georgoulias <tom.georgoulias@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 15:03:30 -0500
Delivered-to: shrike-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <1049918169.5329.0.camel@swalker.theiqgroup.com>
Organization: Motorola Semiconductor Products Sector
References: <3E9459AA.8050402@davidkrider.com> <1049914681.25879.13.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> <3E947809.8080307@davidkrider.com> <1049918169.5329.0.camel@swalker.theiqgroup.com>
Reply-to: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314

Shawn wrote:

I'm fairly certain that they will be addressing the serious issues in
errata releases, I believe glibc will be one of these.

I would hope so. The amount of QA in RHL was *not* supposed to be reduced now that RHEL is on sale, so I would think they will fix all troublesome RHL bugs through errata.

Tom

References:
- Bugfix errata?
  - From: David Krider
- Re: Bugfix errata?
  - From: Florin Andrei
- Re: Bugfix errata?
  - From: David Krider
- Re: Bugfix errata?
  - From: Shawn

Prev by Date: Re: Bugfix errata?
Next by Date: RE: tripwire 3.0 + redhat 9
Previous by thread: Re: Bugfix errata?
Next by thread: Re: Bugfix errata?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux