Re: some alleged shrike "updates" aren't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 13:06, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
>   some of the allegedly newer packages in the shrike updates
> repository at RH don't appear to be any newer than what came
> with the original distro.  kernel-2.4.20-8, samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0,
> among others.

These are errata for the boxed set.  The ISO files distributed via RHN
already have these updates included.  But since the boxed set was
finalized earlier, they'll need these updates.

> 
>   what does this mean?  am i misreading something?

You apparently didn't read the errata notices for those packages.

--Jeremy

-- 
/=====================================================================\
| Jeremy Portzer       jeremyp@xxxxxxxxx       trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\=====================================================================/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux