some alleged shrike "updates" aren't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Red Hat 9 mailing list <shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: some alleged shrike "updates" aren't
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:06:11 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: shrike-list@listman.redhat.com
Reply-to: shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: shrike-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

  some of the allegedly newer packages in the shrike updates
repository at RH don't appear to be any newer than what came
with the original distro.  kernel-2.4.20-8, samba-2.2.7a-7.9.0,
among others.

  what does this mean?  am i misreading something?

rday

Follow-Ups:
- Re: some alleged shrike "updates" aren't
  - From: Jeremy Portzer
- Re: some alleged shrike "updates" aren't
  - From: seth vidal

Prev by Date: Re: Flash and other Browser tools/ RealPlayer-realone..
Next by Date: Re: XDMCP?
Previous by thread: what is a noarch rpm ?
Next by thread: Re: some alleged shrike "updates" aren't
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Centos Users] [Kernel Development] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat Phoebe Beta] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Discussion] [Gimp] [Stuff] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux