On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 12:43, Arend wrote: > > Yes, this is correct. But you will find that blocks on these address > > blocks are implemented as if they were Class A's. i.e. block 209.0.0.0 > > - 209.255.255.255. > > Perhaps some blocks are, but 209 does not seem to be used as a class A > network. Here's my current config from my dsl modem: > > IP Address:209.115.166.xxx > Subnet Mask:255.255.255.192 > Default Gateway:209.115.166.65 > > Last time I checked, I didn't live in Asia. You misunderstood me. I was saying that most all the admins I know have been blocking all IP addresses in that range. Doesn't matter if it's a Class A, B or C (or X, Y Z). Many, many mail admins just dump all mail from 209.x.x.x, 210.x.x.x and 211.x.x.x as a matter of course. Now do you see what I was saying? -- Paradise; can it be all I heard it was? I close my eyes and maybe I'm already there. -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
