On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:17:36 -0800, you wrote: >Of course, I would note that "RH" is much more than the GPL Red Hat Linux >product. I don't see NPTL going into RHEL, so that is still _very_ much >viable for a corporate desktop. What I see is a lot of people that were Ironically enough Red Hat themselves (at least sales) disagree with you. In the clarification about RHEL pricing email https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list/2003-March/005281.html Red Hat sales say that RHEL WS is not meant for the corporate desktop and that Red Hat 9 should be used for the desktop, totally ignoring that the 12 month errata support and hence yearly upgrades makes Red Hat 9 unsuitable for the corporate desktop. -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
