On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 00:28:52 at 12:28:52AM -0800, Eric Burke (eburke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > The bottom line is for a corporate desktop, RH no > longer serves the purpose. Once compatibility is broken by adding > something no one else is doing, all else is out the window. Sorry, but > the whole NPTL gains nothing...no speed...nothing.No other Linux distro > is using it or planning on it. That in itself breaks compatibility and > the products usefulness. > Jesse (or anybody else) may I ask you to elaborate on this a little more (especially the first sentence)? Any feedback is welcome. Ciao, Marco Fioretti -- Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/ Non si vive se non il tempo che si ama. C. A. Helvetius -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
