RH 9.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RH 9.x
From: "Aaron" <microchp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:59:22 -0800
Delivered-to: psyche-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20030328164821.A41623F6D3@listman.redhat.com>
Reply-to: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

Jumping the gun on RH9 was a smart move.

They can EOL 7.x and of course nobody is gonna load 9.x on production boxes which means they only have to support 8.x.

Not a bad idea at all.

--
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RH 9.x
  - From: Gerald Henriksen

Prev by Date: Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
Next by Date: Re: Mozilla 1.3 and Java j2sdk-1.4.1_02-fcs
Previous by thread: Gateway 600YG2 laptop problems with video
Next by thread: Re: RH 9.x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Red Hat General Discussion] [Centos] [Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux