Sorry, I'm not agree. More debatable. A lot of this tools has been developed by Microsoft under pressure/demand of big customers who had no way to solve monitoring/customization of his own servers. This developed tools has been converted into standard tools from NT 4 to 2000. Regards Michael Smith <psyche@xxxxxxxxxxxx>@redhat.com con fecha 26/03/2003 07:09:16 p.m. Por favor, responda a psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx Enviado por: psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx Destinatarios: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx CC: Asunto: Re: Linux vs Windows That's debatable. I'm in the middle of taking the MCSA, and let me tell you, you just have to know where to get to the complexities. Most people haven't even heard of Microsoft Management Console, the advanced Registry Editor, etc. Microsoft just keeps those complexities away from the general user. -Michael On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 08:55, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On 25 Mar 2003, Michael Smith wrote: > > > I think you made some very good points. I would only like to stress the > > fact that: > [...] > > 2) linux has, and probably (even though we don't like to admit it) > > always will be a more complex operating system. > > I don't know why anyone would not admit it. Linux is to Windows > as an F-22 is to a glider. > > -- > Farewell neighbor. Thank you for giving us a safe place for so many > years. > Fred Rodgers - 1928-2003 -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
