On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:31:09PM +0100, Andrew Kelly wrote: > > > naugaranch wrote: > > > > With all the problems I've had with Red Hat 8 - particularly on my server > > (still not running correctly and updated fully). I've actually considered > > regressing to 7.2 on my server. > > This is exactly what I'm facing and exactly the decision > I've made. Enigma runs perfectly for all my needs and I'm sorry > I ever looked forward. I'll be bringing my lost sheep > back very soon. > > > Sounds like Red Hat is doing a MS-type end around. Abandon the RH 8.x > > series and introduce RH 9 because it doesn't have a bad reputation. > > When a release puts a better product in the hands of > the consumer it is a good and welcome thing. When a release > exists for the purpose of revenue generation or as part > of a bit of demographic infighting, everybody loses. > > It's sad to see how prevalent MSing is becoming in the > Linux namespace. I don't see it that way. RH has been cutting a release of their standard distro about every six months for a long time. I think it is great to get access to fully integrated and well tested cutting edge software at that frequency. With the number of RH boxes I run and the frequency of releases I tend to only buy every other release. The production/stable servers can be handled very well with the Advanced server line (now enterprise line) with releases every two years. Chuck -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list