RE: Digital camera question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Gill [mailto:wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tue, March 18, 2003 4:21 PM
> To: 'psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: Digital camera question
> 
> 
> Did you read my early post???. You need to update your 
> gphoto2 files and
> libraries. I had the same problem with my Canon PowerShot S45. After
> updating the GPhoto2 related stuff it worked!! Check out the 
> web link in
> that post for more info.

I got the newest gphoto2 and libgphoto2. It still does not recognize the
camera, which is not surprising, as it is not in the list of supported
cameras. 

Thanks anyway.

Pavel.

> 
> Wolf
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Rozenboim [mailto:pavelr@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, 17 March 2003 10:01 PM
> To: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Digital camera question
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Devine [mailto:dannyboy259@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thu, March 13, 2003 11:47 PM
> > To: RedHat 8.0 mailing list
> > Subject: Re: Digital camera question
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:39, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> > > Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I have Samsung digimax 410 camera. It can be connected to
> > PC with USB cable.
> > > > According to the /var/log/messages it is recognized as
> > USB mass storage
> > > > device and usb-storage and some scsi related modules (sg,
> > sd_mod and
> > > > probably some others) are loaded. I see its listing in 
> > > > /proc/bus/usb/devices. I read somewhere on internet that
> > I should be able to
> > > 
> > > Ity appears to have recognized the camera then.
> > 
> > Not so fast.....I've had problems with mine too, and while 
> it did show 
> > up in the /proc/bus/usb/devices (it gave me the manufacturer id and 
> > model id and whatnot) and in the /proc/scsi directory (as a 
> connected 
> > device), it still wasn't really recognized as a proper USB 
> device and 
> > I wasn't able to do anything with it (i.e. mount and unmount).
> > 
> > I've found the best information on specific devices at the 
> linux-usb 
> > page.
> > 
> > http://www.linux-usb.org/
> > 
> > check the supported devices for your model......
> > 
> > http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/search_res.php?pattern=samsung
> > 
> 
> I found Digimax 340 with a report that it doesn't work either.
> 
> > You may be able to adapt the device info header for the Digimax 340 
> > series to work with the Digimax 410.  I'm not sure what 
> modules those 
> > are in though.  After you complete your mods (if they are 
> not already 
> > there), you will also have to recompile.....
> 
> Where should I look for it? I tried to search the entire 
> kernel tree for
> vendor id/vendor name but could not find anything 
> appropriate. Are those
> drivers located in drivers/usb subdir?
> 
> > 
> > In my experience, I simply copied another header from a 
> similar series 
> > that was supported and modified the model code to match what I was 
> > getting from the /proc/bus/usb/devices file.  I also 
> modified the text 
> > description to match my model.  This worked like a charm.
> > 
> > You should be seeing 0x0839 or 0x0836 for the digimax series,
> > along with
> > a "model identifier" after that.
> 
> I see vendor id 0x0839 and model id 0x000A.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > "just" mount it as scsi device. I tried to mount
> > /dev/sd[a-d][1-4] as well
> > > > as /dev/sd[a-d] devices, but always got an error that it
> > is not valid block
> > > > device. Do I need some camera specific driver? If not,
> > how so I find the
> > > > right device to mount? Does anyone have any experience
> > with this camera?
> > > 
> > > #cat /prc/scsi/scsi
> > > 
> > > That should list the scsi devices in your system.
> > > 
> > > The output of lsusb and the dmesg results following the
> > hotplug event
> > > would be helpfull. So would lsmod output.
> > > 
> > > 	-Thomas
> > --
> > Dan Devine <dannyboy259@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ######################################################################
> Attention: 
> This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you 
> are not the 
> intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender. 
> Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author.
> 
> This e-mail has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal 
> www.marshalsoftware.com
> ######################################################################
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Psyche-list mailing list
> Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> 



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux