Re: Michael Schwendt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, John Lowell wrote:

> John Nall wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:41, John Lowell wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Earlier today, I posted a simple yes-or-no question to to the list and 
> >>got back a lecture and some abuse from a Michael Schwendt. After a 
> >>couple of additional, similar messages from him, I specifically told him 
> >>in the clearest possible terms not to contact me again. He has, 
> >>nevertheless. Has anyone else here ever been similarly annoyed by Mr. 
> >>Schwendt?
> >>
> >>John Lowell
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >None of my business really, but after seeing the different messages I
> >have to conclude that you are in the wrong, Mr. Lowell.
> >
> >Respectfully, John
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> Had you been under the impression that this was the Gallup Poll, John, 
> that I was conducting a survey of who agreed with me? I think you were 
> right the first time, its none of your business really.
> 
> John Lowell

God, what a twit!  Seems to me that you asked everyone's opinion.  Now 
that you're getting it you're upset again.

Another one joins the bit bucket!!!!

-- 
Gerry

"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne"  Chaucer



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux