Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cliff Sarginson wrote:

> No sane-person uses tcsh to write scripts in, it is obscure and
> arcane and riddled with problems..but is also an excellent
> interactive shell.

I'm taking this as an insult! ;=D Actually, I've moved most scripts over
to Perl, but for the small ones I remain with tcsh. Bash is the
nightmare - doesn't work in a coherent way.

> Then there is the zsh, which really is the bees-knees of all
> shells...but hardly known about.

Yup, but I'm so used to tcsh...

> If you want to restrict users in some way to what they can do,
> examine the use of the "restricted" shell options, or the use of
> chroot environments. Or write a shell script that locks them inside
> it somehow and disallows certain commands.

Of course all these restrictons can be circumvented. I think a
"restricted shell" is the best you can get.

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Linux Migration Project: http://www.linux-migration.org/
Red Hat Linux 7.3 for low memory: http://www.rule-project.org/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux