Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users {Correction}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Psyche-List <psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users {Correction}
From: Cliff Sarginson <cls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:19:48 +0100
Delivered-to: psyche-list@listman.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20030205064033.GA1383@raggedclown.net>
References: <IDENLOOPLKEDFPAEAOBGAEEHCBAA.dgenn@rogers.com> <20030205064033.GA1383@raggedclown.net>
Reply-to: psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: psyche-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i

> special construct "#!name_of_shell.

Should be
                    #!name_of_shell

-- 
Regards
   Cliff Sarginson 
   The Netherlands

[ This mail has been checked as virus-free ]



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

References:
- Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users
  - From: Dan G
- Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users
  - From: Cliff Sarginson

Prev by Date: Re: Has Anyone successfully upgraded Redhat 8 to KDE 3.1
Next by Date: Re: cron as root
Previous by thread: Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users
Next by thread: Re: Interactive vs non-interactive shell for users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Red Hat General Discussion] [Centos] [Kernel] [Red Hat Install] [Red Hat Watch] [Red Hat Development] [Red Hat 9] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux