Le mar 28/01/2003 à 22:35, David Durst a écrit : > Hmmmm, the amazing thing is a I have now read all of the posts > in reply to my original and still don't have a clear view if > anyone else has experience this issue. > > I would really not devel into the politics of Java on Linux as > I have before, but let me say this I think it is both > Sun and Redhats at fault in different ways. > > As far as Java being slow, hmmm lemme just say NO. Maybe for GUI > but I think think you could classify Java as slow by any means, > memory intensive for sure but not slow (P.S. Try adjusting OO to use > a little bit more memory and see how that helps the performance) > > So here goes my conclusion of what has happened to my machine and why OO > doesn't work now. > > 1. Worked w/ out Java. > 2. Worked w/ Java 1.3 > 3. Doesn't work now that 1.4 is here > > I think there is probably some nasty dependency buried deep down inside OO > that will work if Java isn't there (Why RH has been fooled), it will work > if the developed againest JVM is there (1.3). But for some reason the > same dependency/code executed againest 1.4 causes a break. > > Just a random though, now can someone tell me if I have any insight at all, > besides RH removed Java dependency. > > > Let's take Eclipse who is nothing more that a glorified editor written in Java. It takes some 30 <b>CPU<b> seconds just to start in a 450 MHz K6/2. Isn't that slow enough? JFM -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
