On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 21:41, Steven I. Usdansky wrote: > I believe the understanding problem lies in the fact that with MS Access, > you get the database server and a very nice client in one package. With > MySQL or Postgres, you have to run the database server program before you > can build a create your database with a client program. I'm currently using > mysqlcc as the client for MySQL. In my opinion, it doesn't come close to > Access's ease of use (no flames please). On the other hand, I don't have > have to worry about the database format changing with every new release of > MySQL the way it does with Access. > Not a flame but this is like comparing a pocketknife with a surgical scalpel. Sure..the pocketknife cuts just as the scalpel does...but you wouldn't want to perform surgery with a pocketknife either! I personally don't believe that MySQL or PGSQL were meant for anything other than the backend. Scott -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
