Re: [Fwd: Wireless Question]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22 Oct 2002, Donald E. Stidwell wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 22:17, Oisin C. Feeley wrote:
[snip]

Cheers Donald.  That's really helpful information.  

> > Donald, could I ask you two slightly OT questions?  I'm interested in 
> > getting a wirelss card and obviously yours works so:
[snip]
> > 2. is it possible to make it use 40/64 bit WEP instead of the 128?
> 
> Sure, just specify in neat that you want to use 64 bit WEP rather than
> 128 and enter the key. Curious as to why you'd use 64 instead of 128.

It's for my wife's laptop which she's using in a university environment 
where the APs only do 40/64-bit.  She's researched it a bit and found that 
the security aspect is not applicable because they (rightfully) insist 
that wireless users use VPN software.  Unfortunately it seems to be 
non-Free Cisco binaries :-(

 > One bad thing about WEP - on my machines, 128 bit WEP cuts 
throughput
> about 1/3. Not really a big deal, but it is something to consider

Again, very interesting.
  
thanks,
Oisin Feeley



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux