Re: Redhat 8 missing smp-kernel as stated by a bugzilla op, but a guy says something else?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:32:50PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> A) it is _not_ a source rpm, it is a binary kernel rpm.  B) the SMP
> kernel is not installed unless a multiprocessor system is detected,
> and by your system specs, your system is not a multi processor system.
> 

Just one note here.  I seem to remember that if you explicitly select to
install the SMP kernel in the installer, then it will be made the default
boot kernel.  I might be smoking crack, but I think that I remember this.

- jkt

-- 
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
Jay Turner, QA Manager          jkt@redhat.com               Red Hat, Inc. 

      No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right;
      a single experiment can prove me wrong.   -- Albert Einstein 





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux