Re: features window managers should have

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ted Clark <bison@visi.com> writes:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Ted Clark <bison@visi.com> writes:
> >>There's difference between edge resistance and edge attraction (ie
> >>"magnatism" [sic]).  In the first case [snip]
> > When adding this feature I plan to experiment with magnetism,
> > attraction, and various thresholds and timeouts. I think it can be
> > made to work pretty well without being obtrusive. Suggestions on where
> > to start are welcome (on the bug report, ideally).
> 
> bugzilla.redhat.com or bugzilla.gnome.org?

The gnome.org bug I mentioned. If you have a configuration you
typically use on other WMs maybe just say which timeouts, etc. you are
using.

> > In the meantime there's a hidden "lock to edges" feature if you hold
> > down Shift that's nice for people who have really hard core
> > must-line-up-all-windows-pixel-perfect tendencies. ;-)
> 
> Yeah, but unless you display window coordinates as I'm moving a window
> I won't know _which_ pixels I'm lining up with! ;-)

Can't help you there. ;-)

Havoc





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux