Re: features window managers should have

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Havoc Pennington wrote:
> James Ralston <qralston+ml.redhat-psyche-list@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: 
>>    5.  The ability to set edge resistance (or to disable it
>>        entirely).
> > 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81704

 From the above link:

"Add some kind of mild "attraction" to window/screen edges, perhaps
only after a timeout."

There's difference between edge resistance and edge attraction (ie 
"magnatism").  In the first case the mouse has to be moved n pixels 
along a given axis when two windows touch before the window being moved 
starts moving again.  So in effect, you're "dropping" pixels, or 
whatever units are used to measure mouse movement on the display.

In the second case, a window "jumps" up against another window when it 
gets n pixels away.  I personally like the former a lot, and really 
dislike the later.  This only serves to demonstrate that window manger 
writers can't make more than about 50% users happy on any given day..

TC





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux