Re: RH 9.0 - XFree86 4.3.0 - is this right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 04:24, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> The low latency patches are already applied (well the non-defective parts
> of it, a small subset of the lowlat patch had bugs).
> The preemption patches are not applied, because they are defective for 2.4 
> kernels. It's not safe to ship them simply because too much code
> in 2.4 kernels depends on the principles
> that the preempt patch changes and doesnt' get fixed by this
> patch. DRM happens to be an example of such code fwiw ;)
> 
> Greetings,
>     Arjan van de Ven

Arjan,
   Thanks very much for the info. Very interesting.

   Right or wrong, this is a process we've been using since I got
involved back at RH 7.3. At least at that time we could see measurable 
improvements in the system by applying these patches over the standard
kernel. Maybe that's no longer true, or should be verified by someone.

   I think the root cause in this case is that I had been using a 2.4.19
kernel patched on my 7.3 and 8.0 systems, and when I Set up this 9.0
boot last week I just sort of did the same thing. I did not understand
the linkage between the kernel and the DRI stuff at all, although it
makes sense.

   I'm going to do some testing of the stock 9.0 kernel and see how it
preforms for me. Thanks for the info!

Thanks,
-- 
Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>



_______________________________________________
xfree86-list mailing list
xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list
IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com

[Red Hat General]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Kernel Development]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux