Re: GTK+ or QT ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





John wrote:
My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because
.  I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work
than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as
buffer overruns.

Are the C++ bindings for gnome? I know GTK+ has GTK--.


.  I think the recent move in Gnome to this button order in dialogues
  <help> ..... <ok>
   defeats one of the goals espoused in the Gnome standards/guidelines of
making UIs consistent and easy to use. Older Gnome, KDE, OS/2 and
Windows has "ok" or equivalent on the viewer's left.

It believe that, like the buttons in KDE is changable.
see the recent OSNews.com article here <http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=2997>


I imagine the GNOME HIG developers had a reason for that placement.

-Thomas



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux