On Samstag 25 April 2009, Christian Stroetmann OntoLab wrote: > Hello Jason, > > > Edward, > > > >> Please, > >> don't flood in this mailing list. > >> Go away! > > > > You are totally out of line here. > > > > First, please following mailing list etiquette and don't top post > > > > Second, Christian, like all others, have a right to post here. You may > > not agree with his posts (or what he is doing with OntoFS), but that > > does not give you the right to tell him to go away. > > > > Third, if the community only relied on you to progress reiserfs, it > > has been years at this point and nothing significant. it is basically > > somewhat dead. > > > > If there was more co-operation and less fighting, perhaps forking > > would not need to be an issue, but with your head up your ass no > > progress gets made, no leaps forward, nada, zip, zilch. > > > > -Jason > > > >> Christian Stroetmann OntoLab wrote: > >>> Dear Christian; > >>> > >>> You wrote: > >>>> With still no project page in sight, > >>> > >>> Under the label of my company and taking the full risk of losing > >>> reputation, in contrast to other well known Linux distributions and > >>> former supporters of R....4 fs which (partly) jumped off the train, I > >>> made the following offers in the past: > >>> 1. Support the R4 fs under the name R4. > >>> 2. Set up a project page or, on the wish of the developement > >>> community, a wiki. > >>> 3. Under an other name, which I've choosen and I'm not allowed to name > >>> in this mailinglist, I've have even developed another kind of file > >>> system. > >>> > >>> The results were: > >>> To 1.: No echo. > >>> To 2.: No replay. > >>> To 3.: I got a kindly "Go away" advice. > >>> And to give it the rest: I do have alternatives and if some persons > >>> think, that they can gain something by their destructive attitude, > >>> than I have to say: Okay, have a nice day. > >>> > >>> Being constructive, I think we need a new projcet management, maybe a > >>> new maintainer, or some bytes for archiving the digital waste. > >>> > >>>> I find it hard to track[0] the progress of the work being towards an > >>>> inclusion of reiser4 into mainline. Unable to help out with real > >>>> code, I look at the reiser4-for-2.6.29 diffstat (sans the fs/reiser4 > >>>> parts!) and see: > >>>> > >>>> Documentation/Changes | 12 > >>>> Documentation/filesystems/reiser4.txt | 75 > >>>> fs/Kconfig | 1 > >>>> fs/Makefile | 1 > >>>> fs/buffer.c | 9 > >>>> fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 > >>>> include/linux/fs.h | 3 > >>>> include/linux/mm.h | 2 > >>>> mm/filemap.c | 4 > >>>> mm/page-writeback.c | 48 > >>>> So, with 4 of them being "just" documentation and build magic, I take > >>>> it that we're 6 files and less than 100 lines of code away from at > >>>> least putting this file system into the new staging/ tree perhaps? > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> I found it more and more jokeless, what is going on around this fs. > >>> Btw.: I can't and I won't follow the claims and resitances made by Al > >>> Viro and other hard core coders against R4 and HFS+, especially the > >>> arguments in the hardlink subject. > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Christian. > >>>> > >>>> [0] http://tinyurl.com/dexfq9 > >>> > >>> Sincerely > >>> Christian *<:o) > > I would really like to know, what was and is going on behind the scenes. > If Mr. Shishkin wants some kind of monetary support for his work, then I > have to say: "Sorry, but not this way" and "The time is over since two > years". That means no money! You got me? Good. > no, you want to make money without paying him, right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
