Mike Cronenworth wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: RHEL vs SUSE From: Aaron > Bliss <abliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 09/30/2008 04:27 PM > >> You may want to look at centos instead of fedora. Binary equivalent of >> RedHat ES. We use RedHat for our most critical boxes, just to be able to <snip> > Unfortunately what I'm working with are people that do not believe in "free" > versions. Even if I explained that it was a copy of RHEL it is still free > and therefore inferior in their eyes. Spare me any antidote. :) > > RHEL or SUSE are the only options on the table. > > I would be using Fedora, but everyone knew I was using that and said "No." > quite readily. Ugh. > Um, I wouldn't use Fedora in production. I'd use centos. When I was looking to upgrade from RH9 a couple of years ago, at home, on my SOHO, I didn't want to pay for RHEL, and my impression, along with everyone I spoke to, including my old acquaintance ESR, felt that it was bleeding edge, not leading edge. So it was kubunto or SUSE. I wound up with SUSE. If I'd known about CentOS, I'd have gone that way. mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
