Ed Wilts wrote: >On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:03:48PM +0400, Security wrote: > > >>And Redhat have not update the last security hole in Wu-ftpd :-/ so >>it's safe to use an other one. >> >> > >Are you sure they're vulnerable? It's definitely not like Red Hat to >ignore security vulnerabilities and you wouldn't be the first person to >say that they're vulnerable when they're actually not. > > > On the Official web site of Wu-ftpd, there is no patch .. I do not try the last security hole but I think wu-ftpd is still vulnerable. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
