On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 05:55:33PM -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > Robert C Paulsen Jr wrote: > > >Ext2 is a reasonable > >choice: > > > >mkfs.ext2 /dev/hdb9 > > > This raises a question now: why (still) ext2 and not ext3? Because he is running RHL 7.0. I'm not sure that ext3 was present back then. 7.0 was kind of a weird release with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels and the user got to chose. -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
