Re: [RH List] Re: Mount question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert C Paulsen Jr wrote:

Because I *though* it wouldn't raise any further questions!


No no, I didn't mean it like that. I was going for a more technical aspect of it. Why would one still use ext2, and not switch to ext3. After all, while doing a fresh install, the default is to format as ext3. And other than the lack of journal capability, what other reasons are there that one would choose not to use ext3.

--
H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley@xxxxxxxxxx> . 303.442.6410 x130
IT Director / SysAdmin / WebSmith . 800.441.3873 x130
Photo Craft Laboratories, Inc. . 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
http://www.pcraft.com ..... . . . Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.





-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux