Leonard den Ottolander writes: > Hi folks, > > > Boo on the uptime though :(. > > > Too bad on the uptime, Tim. I had a webserver up for 251 days last > > summer. > > > We had a name server back in 2000 that had 500 some odd days of > > uptime. > > Although I can understand having such uptimes makes a man proud it also > means that you haven't done a kernel upgrade for that amount of time, which > is a very very very bad thing. Sorry to bust your balls ;-) . I pretty much said the same thing in my original post when I said, "Security related kernel patches come out so often nowdays that any server on the internet with a very long uptime is a *TARGET*!" Also, that nameserver was internal to a lab testing environment, and not connected to the internet. :-) The webserver, however, was simply out of date. :-( -- -------- "And there came a writing to him from Elijah" [2Ch 21:12] -------- R. J. Brown III rj@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.elilabs.com/~rj voice 859 567-7311 Elijah Laboratories Inc. P. O. Box 166, Warsaw KY 41095 fax 859 567-7311 ----- M o d e l i n g t h e M e t h o d s o f t h e M i n d ------ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
