On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:46:23PM -0800, Richard Crawford wrote: > I've discovered that the reasoning is that they're installing Arcserve, > which requires a higher-level user (?). Hmm? Well, if Arcserve isn't installed chmod root, yeah, to run a backup *directly* as the user, you'd need root privs to read/write all files. But for Ghu's sake, they don't need root for everything! Look at the Arcserve installation instructions. IF it can't handle chmod root, at the LEAST the user should only be running it through sudo. > He's convinced that he can place the username in a group to give it root > permissions. Umm...no... -- Dave Ihnat ignatz@xxxxxxxxxx -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
