Re: /etc/localtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Cameron Simpson wrote:

> On 01:30 19 Nov 2003, Rune Berge <rune@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> | > It's the _new_ one, hence it's name. With config files (when marked as
> | > such in the package) RPM tries to be smart about not overwriting your
> | > configuration settings upon package upgrades. So, it did not change the
> | > /etc/localtime customization, but warns about that.
> |
> | But if it is included in the upgrade, shouldn't it be used? I assume it is
> | in for a reason...
>
> Generally, if the existing file _exactly_ matches the one installed
> earlier (i.e. hasn't been hand-edited) then the upgrade replaces it. But
> a changed file could have arbitrary user-applied changes, and no upgrade
> can know how to apply a change to such a file without breaking the user's
> special changes. And so it makes a .rpmnew file that contains what it
> would have installed. And tells you.  The you apply the changes yourself
> (possibly by just copying the new one over the old one if your changes
> don't matter).
>
> Does that clarify things?

Yes, but I still don't know what to do about it. I guess I'll just ignore
it and hope the update isn't important...

Rune


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux