On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:52:53 -0800, Jeff Lasman wrote > On Sunday 26 October 2003 04:22 pm, Peter B. West wrote: > > > So what's your opinion of RH9, both for commercial and personal use. > > When I wrote my post I was thinking about our web servers when I > wrote "commercial use". I've never used RH9 in our webservers > (though two of the control panels we offer support it) because I > didn't feel Apache 2 was far enough advanced to be used for > commercial webhosting. > > While I now feel it is, I'm not willing to make the change to RHL > for the few extra months of support available for it. You may wish also to evaluate Fedora-Legacy which may extend the life cycle of RH 9 way past its EOL. > I never upgrade between whole numbers. I always start fresh. I > think most long-term linux users would agree with me. Which is why Fedora-Legacy appeals to me ... I can stay with RH 9 past its EOL and still get updates/errata. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
