Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:23:33PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> IMHO, the key to understanding such comments is to not read between the
> lines. Szulik specifically refers to "device-drivers" and "traditional
> functionality [...] for that classic consumer purchaser" which refers to
> multimedia applications implemented in both hardware and software and
> also includes the field of games. This is not about a security
> standpoint.
[...]

But that's not what the average user or PHB will read. Most people
will read: "Linux is not ready, better use Windows" (never mind that
Szulik didn't even mention Apple) and MS will make certain it's
understood that way. I stay with what I said: The way it was put, it
was not a smart comment, either way you look at it - even though I
generally agree with the "no false expectations" point of view. But I
still would not recommend Windows instead, for the reasons mentioned
previously.

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <==
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.ribbrock.org 
  "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux