On Monday 27 October 2003 12:03 pm, Jason Dixon wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 11:36, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On 27 Oct 2003 10:10:58 -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: > > > http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/rhlas_errata_policy.html <snip> > > > I have doubts that the errata support period of RHPW is equal > > to Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS. At least some retailers state > > that RHPW has an errata support period of 12+ months. > > I personally called Red Hat two weeks ago regarding Pro Workstation. > They informed me that Pro Workstation would be released with RHEL 3.0 > because it is *based* on RHEL 3.0 and would be supported as such. Until > they inform me otherwise, I will continue to base my decisions on that > information. Thanks for the info Jason. We have several 7.x servers that will probably migrate to RHPW after EOL of 7.x. But we're .edu so RHEL is kinda too expensive. This is good to know that RHPW will last that long. RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN --------------------------------------------------------- "To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." - Linus Torvalds - -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
