Hi Hugh Any idea why i am getting this err ? any other things to check ? i am unable to crontab -l or crontab -e as user root. i am getting the same err msg. i am however able to do crontab -u -e xxx where xxx is my other user. doing a crontab -l or crontab -e as my other user works fine. rest what i did to check cron i have mentioned in my earlier email anybody - any suggestions please thx Abhijit -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:30 PM To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #8436 - 23 msgs Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: Thoughts on Fedora (Wade Chandler) 2. iTunes inside of VMWare inside of Windows (Roberto Dohnert) 3. UPDATE: iTunes inside of VMWare inside of Windows -- Internal CDRW (Roberto Dohnert) 4. RE: usb memory key (Mohamed Kerbachi) 5. fsck erase files at startup ? (Mohamed Kerbachi) 6. Re: rotate logs when they reach a certain size (Krishna Shekhar) 7. Re: Transfering files in SSH (aT) 8. Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list (Abhijit Das) 9. Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list (Abhijit Das) 10. Re: Network Problem-solved..Now another problem (Bilal Dar) 11. RE: Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list (Hugh E Cruickshank) 12. Question bout logrotate (cajun) 13. Re: Question bout logrotate (Jason Dixon) 14. [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? (Mike Pelley) 15. Re: Question bout logrotate (cajun) 16. Re: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? (Jason Dixon) 17. RE: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? (Jason Staudenmayer) 18. RE: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? (Jason Dixon) 19. Re: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? (Mike Pelley) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: "Wade Chandler" <wchandler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Thoughts on Fedora Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:55:09 -0400 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx I get a little biased in these types of discussions. I'm a programmer and a system geek, so I say if you are affected by something jump in and help out. It's there, it's free, it's not that hard, and even if you can't program, you can learn some basics and help a programmer out. Overall it will help anyone understand their system better (not just the things they see, but the whole system, computer and OS inside and out). I guess I see it like this. We all obviously use Linux, and we all appear to use Red Hat. So, to me, that means we have some responsibility in that community considering the costs involved for many of us. I find that I can be more productive on a Linux machine than I can on my Windows (with the proper tools) so I'm all about making it friendly for everyone and geeky for anyone who wants it to be. I want to be able to develop applications for Linux, and be able to think about making that application on Windows, instead of feel like I have to. Is that sometime off in the future...yes I'd say so. But, I feel this is better accomplished through modules and add-ons. I have a lot of things I would like to do here, and I think Fedora is great(...now if I can just find time..it always seems to out run me). On a more general note of where the question was going. I think users and testers and programmers can all help push fixes. I also think it comes down to the way anyone is approached or approaches someone. We all need to keep in mind that unless you are talking to someone from Red Hat they are not getting paid to work on this stuff. They do it for their enjoyment. Which believe it or not has pushed Linux itself www.kernel.org good ol' Linus (which I know we all know). But, I think keeping that all in mind makes us ask questions with a different tone. Maybe we don't have dollars here and there to push in someones face, but simple gestures are really all it takes. Developers want their work to be good, so if there is a problem most are more than happy to fix it. I think Red Hat will have more than enough developers working on Fedora to guide these groups. Just like the kernel every project needs guidance. Each piece needs someone who can control the flow well. I think these folks will come from RH in most cases (according to what I read on the Fedora site). Whether they are the best people for the job or not will only be decided in time, and if they are not, then someone will have to make some good decisions. But, I still believe we have to keep in mind that RH states on the Fedora web site that their commercial software will be based on Fedora. This means they have an interest in it being good stable software. Fedora will also have a release cycle. So, use releases if you are burdened by untested code (I will only use release versions unless testing). I see Fedora as a way to shift some responsibility. For instance, I use RH9. I paid absolutely nothing for it. I love it more than any of my other OS. I like it better than AIX, Solaris, or XP. I realize RH has put an investment into the applications and packaging. I can't thank them enough. But, at the same time, I understand that a company can't front all the costs for everything, and I don't expect them to. Red Hat has employees, and those employees have families to feed. Forget the stock holders for a moment. Those same employees are going to be working on Fedora. I imagine many of them will be spending most of their time working on Fedora, and the rest the value adds, commercial things, and tech support. Their pay check should be incentive for them to perform. Enter users like myself who pay nothing most of the time when dealing with Linux. I don't feel like I should want to point many fingers if I'm not willing to pitch in a bit. That is where I think the community comes into play. Are we willing to say we like Red Hat, or do we start using SuSE, Debian, or Slackware? I believe Red Hat has done a great job, and with the exception of SuSE who I put on the same level as RH, I believe RH is the best Distro available. So, I am willing to pitch in when I can: answer a question here or there, look at some code if I need to, update it and create a patch if I need to (for things I use mainly...so I'm selfish..:-( bad quality I'd say, but I only have so much time). Anyways, to use my favorite analogy to Fedora, Netbeans. Netbeans is sponsered by Sun Microsystems. It is also a free open source product. I use it day in and day out to write Java software. I think it is one of the best IDEs available. I like tooo many things about it to mention. I can't say anything bad about it, though some things I wish could be different. But, all in all, compare it to anything else, it still shines. Compare it to Jbuilder (rather costly). I would use Netbeans any day. Compare it to Eclipse..I think it runs circles around it (my own opinion). The only thing I think Jbuilder has better deals with the files Netbeans uses for it's GUI designer, but that is a small thing, and it can eventually be worked out. Netbeans rolls out patches in a very timely manner. You will also notice that many of the developers have .... Sun.com at the end of their emails. This means they are a paid programmer. Which is a good thing. This means some where there is someone putting together a little upfront design effort to make things role a little smoother (generally speaking). But, don't let that fool you about open source projects without corperate backers. Though, corporate backing is good because it means there is someone who is devoting time to working on the project, and they are being paid to do it. Just to say it, Apache is a non-profit, but you will find corporations using it, and some contributing handsomely. I believe we will see patches flying out of Fedora. I may be wrong, but the only reason I can imagine them not doing so will be because of some sick restrictions Red Hat could lay on the projects. I don't see that happening, but if it did, that would be a reason for slow response time. In general open source projects fix bugs faster than commercial ones, or this has been my experience rather. It will all depend on the model used. Some company's like Seapine software are an exception to this rule. They produce a source control system called Surround which I believe is better than any other. They have fixed bugs and released upgrades rather rapidly. We have been beta testers at different times for them. You'd have to check it out to see what I mean. Clients on Mac, Windows, and Linux. Side tracked....but it is good. Also, something else to keep in mind. Most of the applications we use on Linux are open source. Which means, they have a home of their own. Patches are usually going to depend on those developers anyways. So, probably an important thing to remember is that Fedora projects will include a lot of code reviewing. i.e. OpenSSH will be reviewed by developers responsible for the section that package fits into, then there will be collaboration with the actual OpenSSH project. You can definitely expect this to be the case. Code review and collaboration will catch more bugs than you can imagine. This is a plus. Anyways, those are a bunch of my jumbled thoughts. I hope this is coherent enough for the debate. It is 11:39PM US EST at the moment in good ol'NC. :-D. I won't assume too much however until I have a milestone to throw FUD against, so in all fairness....I say we wait on a release and give it a while. :-) Wade -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:40 PM To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Thoughts on Fedora At 20:15 10/25/2003, you wrote: >I don't agree with the notion that some how Fedora is going to be any >less stable than the "free" RH9 many use on this list now. Neither do I. However, to give you something to think about, the "other" argument against Fedora according to some people is that you cannot be sure that "the community" will roll out patches and security updates in a timely fashion. That is a valid concern, since this early in the game we do not yet know how that will be done and speculation is to be expected. What thoughts would you have on that subject? (Wade or anyone else.) -- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:36:31 -0400 From: Roberto Dohnert <webwarrior@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: trilug@xxxxxxxxxx CC: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx, fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx, redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: iTunes inside of VMWare inside of Windows Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx I have recieved numerous e-mails about this issue and I thought I would make it known to any and all interested parties since I am the proclaimed expert of Windows inside of VMWare. Yes, the new iTunes can be run inside of Windows inside of VMWare but, (yes you knew a but was coming) You cannot run visualizations because VMWare drivers do not support OpenGL, Do not allocate less than 256mb of RAM for the guest OS, I highly reccomend upgrading to VMWare 4.0.5 since memory management was greatly improved in that version. If you wish to use it inside of VMWare 4.0.0 or below, YOU CANNOT BE DOING ANYTHING IN LINUX. The Apple Music Store works, you can access the store and download and do what you want. If you wish to make custom CD's on an internal CD-RW you are out of luck I think, I have to do some more testing with mine, but upon inital testing it didnt work. but with External burners it works fine, unload the USB mass storage Modules in Linux before you can mount the external burner in the guest OS. If you are going to use the iPod with VMWare make sure it is not mounted in Linux otherwise VMWare refuses to see it -- ---- For information on PowerPC Linux and x86 Linux please go to my website: http://www.geocities.com/kane121975/ I have many specific SuSE Linux related how-tos and much more helpful information Yahoo IM: kane121975 AOL: Desparado166 ICQ: 119807053 MSN Messenger: latinlover209 --__--__-- Message: 3 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 01:15:41 -0500 From: Roberto Dohnert <webwarrior@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list <trilug@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: suse-linux-e@xxxxxxxx, redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: UPDATE: iTunes inside of VMWare inside of Windows -- Internal CDRW Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Did not take me long at all, Yes you can do a burn using an Internal CD-RW. When you go to add the device you cannot do it by its hd label, you have to give VMWare the serial emulation, for Example under SUSE Linux 9 my serial emulation label is /dev/sr1. That is the information that needs to be provided -- ---- For information on PowerPC Linux and x86 Linux please go to my website: http://www.geocities.com/kane121975/ I have many specific SuSE Linux related how-tos and much more helpful information Yahoo IM: kane121975 AOL: Desparado166 ICQ: 119807053 MSN Messenger: latinlover209 --__--__-- Message: 4 Subject: RE: usb memory key Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:08:37 +0100 From: "Mohamed Kerbachi" <Mohamed.Kerbachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx I have used many memory flash with RedHat 9.0 with nno problem just issue "tail -f /var/log/message" and plug the usb flash you will se a message and mount the drive like this: mkdir /mnt/flash mount -t vfat /dev/What_You_See_in_LOG_MESSGAES /mnt/flash hope that help ;) -----Message d'origine----- De : Gordon Messmer [mailto:yinyang@xxxxxxxxx] Envoye : dimanche 26 octobre 2003 00:07 A : redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Objet : Re: usb memory key William Burgos wrote: > > I can I mount a usb memory key? > > Do I need some drivers or are these already in RH9 The drivers you need are included in the kernel in RH9. You've been advised to mount /dev/sda1, but most of the sticks I've seen don't have partitions. When you plug the memory stick in, log in as root and use 'fdisk -l /dev/sda' to look at the partition table. If it looks like nonsense (you'll know what I mean), then your memory stick doesn't have partitions, and you should mount /dev/sda. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list --__--__-- Message: 5 Subject: fsck erase files at startup ? Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 08:29:13 +0100 From: "Mohamed Kerbachi" <Mohamed.Kerbachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "RedHat mailling list (E-mail)" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx A server that i can admin reboot very often (all partition are ext2) so an fsck is always made. Now i see some log files are erased and a new ones are created by OS???!!! is it possible that fsck erase files ?? thx --__--__-- Message: 6 From: "Krishna Shekhar" <krishna.shekhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: rotate logs when they reach a certain size Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:44:33 +0530 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Hi, Better use logrotate. Edit the configuration files in /etc/logrotate.conf and /etc/logrotate.d/ regards, Krishna, RHCE Network/Systems Engineer Spectranet http://www.spectranet.com http://www.krisindigitalage.com Krishna's homepage on the Internet!! Keith R Wood writes: > find DIRECTORYNAME -size XX -type f -exec rm -f {} ";" > > The above command will search starting in the directory DIRECTORYNAME > (and below) and find all files that are of size XX and delete them. > > This command could easily be put in a crontab file. > > XX is in 512 byte blocks by default. If c follows XX then the units will > be bytes, if k follows XX then the units would be kilobytes. > > Hope this helps. > > krw > > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 12:13, Genti Hila wrote: >> The cron jobs and logrotate seem to manipulate logs in a time basis, but i >> was trying to figure out a way how to make the logs delete when they get big >> to a certain size and not in a daily or weekly or whatever time basis. >> >> Does anybody know how to do that in Redhat 9 ? >> >> Genti >> > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list --__--__-- Message: 7 From: aT <atif@xxxxxxxx> Organization: Bayt.com To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Transfering files in SSH Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:48:50 +0400 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx did u try scp ?? It comes wit ssh . On Friday 24 October 2003 09:28, Christopher Lyon wrote: > You can also give rsync a try > > > rsync -e ssh ......... > > > man rsync > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Donald Tyler [mailto:dtyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:56 AM > > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Transfering files in SSH > > > > Hi, > > > > I finally managed to get my firewall server up (Thanks to everyone on > > the list who helped). > > > > I want to be able to administer the server remotely. But the only > > problem I have is that I don't know how to transfer files from my > > workstation to the server via SSH. Can anyone point me in the > > direction > > > of some info? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Donald > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Syed Atif Ali Desk: 971 4 3911914 _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ -- --__--__-- Message: 8 From: Abhijit Das <ADas@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "'redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:48:03 +0530 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Hi my linux kernel is 2.2.20 i am trying to edit/list crontab [i also tried crontab -e -u root] but i am getting this err msg: You (root) are not allowed to use this program (crontab) See crontab(1) for more information i checked /etc/cron.allow root and my other users are listed [fyi i am able to edit/list crontab with my other users] there is no cron.deny file i checked /var/spool/cron and root is listed there. i can do a more root to see my crontab entries. i checked the crontab file under /usr/bin , nobody has tampered with the permissions or setuid bit. what else can cause this err msg to come ? can anybody help me please thx Abhijit --__--__-- Message: 9 From: Abhijit Das <ADas@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "'redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 16:08:54 +0530 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Hi > > my linux kernel is 2.2.20 > i am trying to edit/list crontab [i also tried crontab -e -u root] > but i am getting this err msg: > You (root) are not allowed to use this program (crontab) > See crontab(1) for more information > > i checked /etc/cron.allow root and my other users are listed [fyi i am > able to edit/list crontab with my other users] > there is no cron.deny file > > i checked /var/spool/cron and root is listed there. i can do a more root > to see my crontab entries. > i checked the crontab file under /usr/bin , nobody has tampered with the > permissions or setuid bit. > > what else can cause this err msg to come ? > > can anybody help me please > > thx > Abhijit > --__--__-- Message: 10 From: "Bilal Dar" <bilal@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Network Problem-solved..Now another problem Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:12:18 +0300 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Hi, I had the same problem once ... just edit /etc/sysconfig/network Bilal. --__--__-- Message: 11 From: "Hugh E Cruickshank" <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Question on Crontab; unable to edit/list Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 04:49:32 -0800 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Hi Abhijit: The -u param is for use by the root user to access other user's crontab files (the manpage say "privilege user"). You should be able to do "crontab -e" for any user (including root) to edit their own crontab file and "crontab -e -u xxx" for root to edit user xxx's crontab file. HTH Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com From: Abhijit Das Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 02:18 > > Hi > > my linux kernel is 2.2.20 > i am trying to edit/list crontab [i also tried crontab -e -u root] > but i am getting this err msg: > You (root) are not allowed to use this program (crontab) > See crontab(1) for more information > > i checked /etc/cron.allow root and my other users are listed [fyi > i am able > to edit/list crontab with my other users] > there is no cron.deny file > > i checked /var/spool/cron and root is listed there. i can do a > more root to > see my crontab entries. > i checked the crontab file under /usr/bin , nobody has tampered with the > permissions or setuid bit. > > what else can cause this err msg to come ? > > can anybody help me please > > thx > Abhijit > --__--__-- Message: 12 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:10:56 -0600 From: cajun <cajunlee@xxxxxxxxxx> To: RedHat-List <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Question bout logrotate Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Hi all, One quick question bout logrotate, if someone could turn the light on for me I would be greatly in your debt. In the example of logrotate they use the command killall. Are they stopping the link between the log file and the process at this point? The reason I am asking, I have a couple of logs that I want to add and was wondering if this is necessary? Thanks for making this clearer!!!! Lee Perez --__--__-- Message: 13 Subject: Re: Question bout logrotate From: Jason Dixon <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Red Hat Mailing List <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Organization: DixonGroup Consulting Date: 26 Oct 2003 10:22:10 -0500 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 10:10, cajun wrote: > Hi all, > > One quick question bout logrotate, if someone could turn the light on > for me I would be greatly in your debt. In the example of logrotate > they use the command killall. Are they stopping the link between the > log file and the process at this point? The reason I am asking, I have > a couple of logs that I want to add and was wondering if this is necessary? I'm not sure what version of RH you're using, but RH9's logrotate scripts use kill (on my box). Either way, yes, a kill/killall -HUP (interrupt signal) is used to stop the process (closing the write on the old logfile), and start the process (opening the write on the new logfile). View the killall manpage to understand how it's different from kill. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net --__--__-- Message: 14 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:56:28 -0330 From: Mike Pelley <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: redhat-list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Sorry for the OT post - I'm in a time crunch and need a quick-and-dirty reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode. Basically, I need to have the reference for http://www.foo.com go through to the reverse proxy to the internal web server. The internal server is using virtual hosts as well. Thanks! Mike --__--__-- Message: 15 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:32:54 -0600 From: cajun <cajunlee@xxxxxxxxxx> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Question bout logrotate Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Jason Dixon wrote: (snip) >I'm not sure what version of RH you're using, but RH9's logrotate >scripts use kill (on my box). Either way, yes, a kill/killall -HUP >(interrupt signal) is used to stop the process (closing the write on the >old logfile), and start the process (opening the write on the new >logfile). > >View the killall manpage to understand how it's different from kill. > > > Thanks Jason and sorry bout that, I forgot to say that I am running RH9. I have to remember to start putting that in all the questions that I ask. That is what I thought that meant, but wanted to make sure. I'm still learning!! Thanks again. Lee Perez --__--__-- Message: 16 Subject: Re: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? From: Jason Dixon <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Red Hat Mailing List <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Organization: DixonGroup Consulting Date: 26 Oct 2003 10:34:55 -0500 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 10:26, Mike Pelley wrote: > Sorry for the OT post - I'm in a time crunch and need a quick-and-dirty > reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode. Basically, I > need to have the reference for http://www.foo.com go through to the > reverse proxy to the internal web server. The internal server is using > virtual hosts as well. You should be able to pull what you need out of this: http://www.cafesoft.com/products/cams/docs/webagent/ApacheReverseProxy.html HTH. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net --__--__-- Message: 17 From: Jason Staudenmayer <jasons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:31:01 -0500 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Can you say "port forward" The most recommended way to set that would be with iptables rule and not with apache. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Pelley [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:26 AM To: redhat-list Subject: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? Sorry for the OT post - I'm in a time crunch and need a quick-and-dirty reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode. Basically, I need to have the reference for http://www.foo.com go through to the reverse proxy to the internal web server. The internal server is using virtual hosts as well. Thanks! Mike -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list --__--__-- Message: 18 Subject: RE: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? From: Jason Dixon <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Red Hat Mailing List <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Organization: DixonGroup Consulting Date: 26 Oct 2003 10:42:54 -0500 Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 10:31, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > Can you say "port forward" > The most recommended way to set that would be with iptables rule and not > with apache. Not necessarily. If you need to load-balance and/or distribute different sites to different internal servers, an application proxy is exactly the ticket. He didn't specify whether he was redirecting ALL http traffic or simply this domain. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net --__--__-- Message: 19 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:15:44 -0330 From: Mike Pelley <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mo de? Reply-To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Actually, we're doing this already. We port forward TCP 80 to the internal web server. However, this is an IIS server and the owner has a lack of confidence in IIS security (I wonder why ;-) So, he'd like to put an Apache server in a DMZ and then have it forward requests to the internal server. That way, he can still do his ASP "thing" but have Apache keeping direct access away. Jason Staudenmayer wrote: >Can you say "port forward" >The most recommended way to set that would be with iptables rule and not >with apache. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Pelley [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:26 AM >To: redhat-list >Subject: [OT] Good reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode? > > >Sorry for the OT post - I'm in a time crunch and need a quick-and-dirty >reference for setting up Apache in reverse proxy mode. Basically, I >need to have the reference for http://www.foo.com go through to the >reverse proxy to the internal web server. The internal server is using >virtual hosts as well. > >Thanks! > >Mike > > > > --__--__-- __ redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list End of redhat-list Digest -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
