RE: setting up syslog, am i missing a step?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin Banks <mailto:justinb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    on Thursday, October 23, 2003 4:39 PM said:

> If there is no proto qualifier, all protocols consistent with the type
> are assumed, e.g. 'port 53' means '(tcp or udp) port 53'

Thanks.

Well that's both good and bad. It's good because that means the command
is doing what it should be but it's bad because I'm still not seeing any
traffic.

That can mean one of two things. The router has not seen anything that
would warrant an event being sent via syslog, or the router is not
working correctly (assuming everything is setup correctly.)


Thanks!
Chris.


--
Don't like reformatting your Outlook replies? Now there's relief!
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux