-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:10:57 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > I wish everyone signed their messages, but inline and without attachments. > I wish I had already taken the time to figure out how to sign mine, but > inline and without attachments. Digital signatures ARE important, and > attachments ARE annoying. Inline (aka "clear text") signatures are the old and deprecated form. S/MIME PGP detached signatures would be the right way to go. But using new features, which are not [fully] supported by all mail user agents and list management software, usually has side effects. Such as unreadable Base64 encoded message bodies in list archives or signatures, which verify as bad because the mailing-list software modifies the mesage body content. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/iqZi0iMVcrivHFQRAj77AJ0ctOfYEZJ6s2lSNNmFJ/YV/9CjegCeLNJz jmGbs/8lY0wmF6dLKTZjNu0= =kI7g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
