Am 13.06.24 um 22:27 schrieb Dragan Milivojević:
full test log: https://pastebin.com/raw/eq2CbjY7
not very appealing
Sequential 4k read, single disk | 828k | 3233MiB/s
Sequential 4k read, 2 disk RAID10F2, 64k chunk | 523k | 2044MiB/s
RAID0 is off-topic when it comes to RAID1/RAID10 with two disk and not a
RAID at all
There is a reason why I included the RAID0 results. It seems that you desire
to argue for the sake of argument, so I will stop responding to your messages.
i am thrilled to hear the reason why you compare RADI0 with RAID10 but
no RAID1 when the whole question is "do i gain anything with a cripppled
RAID10 with two disks versus a ordinary RAID1"
i could understand the reason to *additionally* add RAID0 while
everybody knows it's faster but the opposite of redundancy
coming up with "RAID10 versus RAID0" is idiotic
