Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
From: Dragan Milivojević <galileo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:46:15 +0200
Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8eea69b5-4abb-46b6-8c7b-05c7ea0bf591@thelounge.net>
References: <ZmiYHFiqK33Y-_91@lazy.lzy> <cd3ed227-1410-478b-b86b-973d76b587df@thelounge.net> <ZmnZYgerX5g8S9Cp@lazy.lzy> <8eea69b5-4abb-46b6-8c7b-05c7ea0bf591@thelounge.net>

> stripes are "half of the file on disk 1, the other half on disk 2"
> that's not possible with only 2 drives
>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_RAID_levels#Linux_MD_RAID_10

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
  - From: Reindl Harald

References:
- RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
  - From: Piergiorgio Sartor
- Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
  - From: Reindl Harald
- Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
  - From: Piergiorgio Sartor
- Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
  - From: Reindl Harald

Prev by Date: Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] dm-raid: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE check for sync_thread in raid_resume
Previous by thread: Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
Next by thread: Re: RAID-10 near vs. RAID-1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux