Re: heavy IO on nearly idle RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, dem 19.03.2024 um 18:48 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:

> As you can reproduce this, and it works with an earlier version, the
> fastest way to resolve the issue is unfortunately to bisect the issue to 
> find the commit causing the regression.

I agree, but bisecting between kernel 6.1.76 and 6.6.13 sounds like a bit of work, doesn't it? :-(

As this happens on my computer that I need for work every day (and night :-), it makes it even more
complicated. I could try to set up another system (hardware available, but I'd have to buy a SSD for
it), but this will take some time...


Am Dienstag, dem 19.03.2024 um 23:05 +0500 schrieb Roman Mamedov:

> I think it might be related to discard or write zeroes support on 6.6. I had
> some issues enabling USB TRIM on kernel 6.6, compared to 6.1.
> 
> What do you get for "lsblk -D" on both kernels and both storage drivers on 6.6,
> are there any differences?

I tried 6.1 and 6.6 both with UAS enabled/disabled, and I get identical results:

NAME        DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO
sda                0      512B       2G         0
├─sda1             0      512B       2G         0
│ └─md0            0      512B       2G         0
└─sda2             0      512B       2G         0
  └─md1            0      512B       2G         0
sdb                0        0B       0B         0
├─sdb1             0        0B       0B         0
│ └─md0            0      512B       2G         0
└─sdb2             0        0B       0B         0
  └─md1            0      512B       2G         0
sdc                0        0B       0B         0
nvme0n1            0      512B       2T         0
├─nvme0n1p1        0      512B       2T         0
├─nvme0n1p2        0      512B       2T         0
├─nvme0n1p3        0      512B       2T         0
│ └─md0            0      512B       2G         0
└─nvme0n1p4        0      512B       2T         0


> Aside from that, trying "blktrace" was a good suggestion to figure out the
> process writing or even the content of what is being written.

I tried to understand blktrace, but failed :-) I've never worked with this tool...

Can someone give me advices how to use it, and which results you are interested in?


greetings, Michael

-- 
Michael Reinelt <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ringsiedlung 75
A-8111 Gratwein-Straßengel
+43 676 3079941





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux